Ir al contenido principal

Understanding the SOLID Principles

There exist some principles that make a procedure easier to perform, with this resource, it is viable to create clean products. In programming, exist something called SOLID principles that ensure quality and good performance while developing code, this acronym SOLID are the 5 widely accepted principles:

S - Single Responsibility Principle

A class should have exactly one responsibility.

O - Open/Closed Principle

A class or a function should be open for extension but closed for modification.

L - Lisvok Substitution Principle

Keep the relationship between classes and functions.

I – Interface Segregation Principle

Avoiding interfaces that overloads classes with responsibilities that this classes don’t actually need.

D – Dependency Inversion Principle

Depend upon abstractions not upon concretions.”

By understanding each one of this SOLID Principles, we could manage to create good code, and by good code I mean cleaner code that is maintainable and modular. Programming has important responsibilities while developing code for yourself and third parties. At the moment one writes code its understandable at that specific moment in time, but if this code is not well documented or the structure of the code has not a defined structure it is very difficult to manage and it is almost impossible to understand it after the code was developed.

In other hand we have obfuscated code, the art of converting code into not readable code, it is ingenious. The both counterparts exist for different purposes. I wonder if SOLID principles contests exist, because The International Obfuscated C Code Contest exists. (https://www.ioccc.org/)

Obfuscate: tr.v. -cated, -cating, -cates.
    1. To render obscure.
    1. To darken.
  1. To confuse: his emotions obfuscated his judgment.
    [LLat. obfuscare, to darken : ob(intensive) + Lat. fuscare,
    to darken < fuscus, dark.] -obfuscation n. obfuscatory adj

The goals are the following:

The IOCCC:
  • To write the most Obscure/Obfuscated C program within the rules.
  • To show the importance of programming style, in an ironic way.
  • To stress C compilers with unusual code.
  • To illustrate some of the subtleties of the C language.
  • To provide a safe forum for poor C code. :-)
for example:

#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<ctype.h>
#include<time.h>
#include<stdint.h>
Q unsigned d; Q char E; Q int k;
Q long u; Q size_t t; Q const char U;
#define L toupper
#define M SIZE_MAX-1
#ifndef S
#define S 38
#elif S < 38
#undef S
#define S 38
#elif S > M
#undef S
#define S M
#endif
#define l S-1
#define Y strlen
#define Z printf
#define K static
#define z do{
K E W[]="stqvvwxzwtzuvvryusuxvtrqsruxttrxvwqxq"; K E T[S]= {77,69,84,72,73,78,75,83,32,73,84,32,73,83,32,76,73,75,69,32,65,32,87,69,65,83,69,76,0} ;
K U C[]=" !\"&'(),.0123456789;?ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
/*NO*/
K E P[2][sizeof(T)]; K t G=0;
#ifndef N
#define N 25
#elif N < 4
#undef N
#define N 3
#elif N > M
#undef N
#define N M
#endif
/*BLOB*/
K u R=1; K d D=0; K k X(k f,k t){ return (rand()%((t)-(f)+1)+(f)); }
K E c() {return C[X(0,(k)Y(C)-1)];%> Q struct x { E G[sizeof T];
t F; } x; K x O[N];
/* Special C main() handler (encapsulation): */
#define r(main) main
r(k main(k a, E **V)) { x x; E*b;
U *A=T; k h=0,s,q=0,m=0,y=0,n=N==97,J=0; t i,j,

/* prototype for special C parser H() below */
F H(); H(<% H(for (s = 1; s < a && *V[s++]; ) H(<%
H(E *v=V[s-1]; H(if (*v!='-'||h) H(g(o) w(f) H(
while (*++v) H(switch (*v) { w(case '-') h=1; g(f)
w(case 'r') H(if ((R=strtol(v+1,&b,0)) < 1 || R > 100)/*CODING*/
<% Z("mutation rate out of range\n") ; m=1); %> else m=0; g(f)
w(case 'q') q=1; Z("quiet output\n") ; g(f) w(case 'm') J=1;
g(f) w(default) g(f) %>); H(continue))); H(w(o) H(y=1;
H(i = Y(V<:s-1]); H(if(i > l) i=l; H( strncpy(T,V[s-1:>,i)
; H(T[i]='\0')))))))); })); }); H(H(if (n&&!y) for (j=0
; j<37; ++j) T[j]=W[j]-'A'); H(for ( ; *A && strchr(C, L(*A))
; ++A)); H(if (*A) <% Z("'%c' not in keyboard \"%s\"\n", *A,C)
; return 1; })/*THIS*/); H(srand((d)time(0)); memset(&x, 0, sizeof x);
memset(O,0,sizeof O)); H(Z(/*IS*/"target '%s'\n", T); H(Z(
"mutation rate %ld\n", R)); H(if((m=(m||J||N<4)))
Z("monkey at typewriter\n"); H(for ( j=0; j<N; ++j) H(for
(i=0; i<Y(T); ++i) O[j].G[i]=c())))); H(while (!D) { H(if (++

G==M) {Z("Too many attempts, blaming the monkey Eric even if "
"he isn't typing or doesn't exist. Bye.\n"); return 1; } H(for
(j=0; j<N&&!D; ++j) { F = 0;/*NOT*/ H(for (i =0; i < Y(T); ++i)) { H(
if (L(O[j].G[i]) == L(T[i]))) ++F; } /*A*/ O[j].F=F; H(if (((D=(F==Y(T)))
||G==1)&&(!q||D)) Z("Generation %4zu\tOffspring %2zu: %s\n",G
-1,j+1,O[j] .G); })); H(if (D)break;); s=0; /*COMPACT*/ H(if (m) g(p) else H(z
s=1; H(for(i=0; i<N-1; ++i) { H(if (O<:i].F >= O[i+1].F) g(h)) x=O[
i+1:>; O[i]=O[i+1]; O[i+1]=x; s=0; w(h); }); }while(!s))); w(p
) H(strcpy(P[0],O[0].G); strcpy(P[1],O[1].G)); H(for (j=0; j<N; ++j)
{ H(for (i=0;!m&&i<Y(T); ++i) H(if ( X(0,9)<5) O[j] .
G[i]=P[0][i]); H(else O[j] . G[i]=P[1][i];)); /*BLOB*/ H(if (!
q) Z("Generation %4zu\tOffspring %2zu: %s -> " ,G,j+1,O[j].
G); H(for/*OF*/ (i=0; i<Y(T); ++i) { H(if (X(1,100) <= R || m)
O[j].G[i]=c(); })); H(if (!q) Z("%s (%s)\n",O[j].G,m
?"monkey typing" : "mutation"))); /*OCTETS*/ }); H(if (!
q) Z("**\n")); })); return 0; }

(Ferguson 2018 : prog-simple.c)


It is very hard to read….

References:

https://www.ioccc.org/index.html
https://www.ioccc.org/2018/2018.tar.bz2
http://34.212.143.74/s201911/tc3049/solid.html

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Who needs an Architect?

“We have met the enemy, and he is us.” Human beings are symbolic animals, we give an interpretation of our observation, recognizing everything as a symbol, creating concepts in order to give meaning to our existence. At first creating certain laws that rule our reality because each concept and law we created makes sense in our own interpretation, from that we continued creating more and more concepts and laws which are based in our preview interpretation, being the architecture of our whole understanding. Society has become the architect of every brick that constructs reality, and the architect is the one who makes the important decisions in order to continue the construction. With one building which has an established basis, and with the expansion during the course of time, it is difficult or even impossible to make changes into the functionality and shape, it could have slightly modifications but it will never change the structure at its roots, the complexity of this system is

WarGames

How far technology can go? It is an often question everyone ask, including such philosophical questions about we humans and our creations, just like our Frankenstein Monster, our creation could bring chaos to ourselves. We have the power to create and the limit of our creation could be bypass by that same creation. This movie called War Games, bring this topic and it is an actual matter, and now even more because now a days technology had reached tremendous power and capacity that is very impressive, some tasks that we humans cannot do, or maybe as fast, are done by our own creation. Just like the arguments of the Android David in the movies Prometheus and Alien Covenant, David reached a conscious level that defined him to be as he was and committing every action during the movie. It is that self evolution that keeps growing and it hasn’t the same limits as human interpretation has. Another example is this classic movie 2001 A Space Odyssey, from S. Kubrik, HAL 9 000, who has e